vegfr2 staining (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Vegfr2 Staining, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 985 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vegfr2+staining/pmc05711959-151-2-15?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 985 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Multi-physics interactions drive VEGFR2 relocation on endothelial cells"
Article Title: Multi-physics interactions drive VEGFR2 relocation on endothelial cells
Journal: Scientific Reports
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16786-4
Figure Legend Snippet: VEGF-A and gremlin induce VEGFR2 rearrangement on EC surface. ( A ) ECD-VEGFR2-EYFP ECs were stimulated by a VEGF-A or gremlin gradient for 2 hours, fixed and analysed using a Zeiss Axiovert 200M system (630×; white bar: 10 μm). Arrows indicate ECD-VEGFR2-EYFP-enriched cell lamellipodia. ( B ) HUVECs adherent on Fibrinogen or VEGF-A-enriched substrates were stained for VEGFR2 (green) and actin (red) and analysed using a LSM510 Meta confocal microscope. Images show the basal portion of adherent cells with the orthogonal z reconstruction of the whole cell (630×; white bar: 10 μ m). ( C ) VEGFR2-EC, seeded on immobilized gremlin or on coverglass for 4 hours, were incubated with 150 ng/mL of gremlin for 90 minutes at 4 °C and washed with 1.5 mol/L NaCl. VEGFR2-bound gremlin, in the apical portion of the cells, was detected by immunofluorescence analysis using a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M microscope system (630x; white bar: 10 μ m). Data are expressed as percentage ± s.d. of gremlin positive area with respect to the total cell area (n = 20 cells/sample; * P < 0.001, Student’s t-test).
Techniques Used: Staining, Microscopy, Incubation, Immunofluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: VEGF-A and gremlin reduce VEGFR2 motility on EC surface. ( A ) FRAP analysis was performed on cell plasma membrane of serum-starved ECD-VEGFR2-EYFP over-expressing GM7373 cells treated or not with VEGF-A or gremlin (50 ng/mL). Images were acquired at one per minute for 12 minutes, 2 before and 10 after bleaching. The bleached area is indicated by a square and the recovery time is indicated over the images as seconds after photobleaching (630x; white bar: 20 μ m). ( B ) Collected images were analyzed using simFRAP ImageJ plugin to calculate diffusion coefficients. The graph shows diffusion coefficient mean ± s.d. of control, VEGF-A, and gremlin treated cells ( n = 7 – 15; * P < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Techniques Used: Clinical Proteomics, Membrane, Expressing, Diffusion-based Assay, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Time evolution of the VEGFR2-gremlin complex formation on the EC membrane. Comparison is made between the VEGFR2 total fluorescence intensity (free and bound) in contact the substrate (red dots) and the numerical simulation data (green lines). To allow comparisons, both sets of data have been normalized to the values reached at the final time t F = 7200 s.
Techniques Used: Membrane, Comparison, Fluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: The chemo-mechanical transport model describes VEGFR2 relocation dynamics. ( A ) Time evolution of the spatial concentration c R of free VEGFR2 along the cell membrane. Each curve plots the distribution of free receptors at different times t = 60 n , with n = 0, 1, 2, … 120 s from the beginning of the experiment at t = 0 to the final time t F = 7200 s. ( B ) Spatial evolution of the concentration c C of the receptor-ligand complex at various times. The curves report the numerical simulation: points A, B, and C correspond to those in ( A ). ( C ) VPM staining for VEGFR2 confirms peaks in the intensity of fluorescence at the boundary of the substrate/membrane contact surface.
Techniques Used: Concentration Assay, Membrane, Staining, Fluorescence

![Activin reduces expression of Rab11. A: Diagram of <t>VEGFR2</t> trafficking. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–mediated activation of VEGFR2 triggers its internalization and trafficking. Rabs govern trafficking decisions that result in the degradation or recycling of VEGFR2. The destination of the activated VEGFR2, as well as its interaction with protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) 1b, influences VEGF-induced signaling. B: Confluent human retinal endothelial cells (HRECs) were treated for 24 hours with either vehicle [0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in water; black bar] or activin (50 ng/mL; gray bar), harvested, and subjected to quantitative real-time PCR analysis. The resulting data were normalized to ACTB (β-actin) and expressed as relative expression. The data in the bar graph are the results of a single representative experiment. At least three independent experiments showed similar results. C: Same as B , except cells were harvested and subjected to Western blot analysis using the indicated antibodies. The images are representative Western blot analyses; the bar graphs show the mean expression in response to activin in three to five independent experiments. The molecular mass of Rab5 is 24 kDa; RABEP2, 64 kDa; Rab7, 2 kDa 2; Rab11, 25 kDa. RasGAP (124 kDa) was included as a loading control. D: Immunostaining for VEGFR2 (green) and Rab11 (red) in HRECs pretreated with activin (50 ng/mL) or vehicle for 24 hours before treatment with VEGF (100 ng/mL) or vehicle [phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)] for 30 minutes. The graph depicts the percentage of VEGFR2 that colocalized with Rab11. Activin reduced VEGFR2-Rab11 colocalization in VEGF-treated cells in two independent experiments; the same trend was observed in a third experiment, which did not reach statistical significance. The difference in means between two groups was analyzed using t -test. Data are given as means ± SEM ( B – D ). n = 4 to 6 fields of view per group. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ P < 0.001. Scale bars = 10 μm ( D ). NS, not statistically significant.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_9374/pmc12489374/pmc12489374__gr4.jpg)